Hinweis: Wir erhalten Provisionen ueber Partnerlinks. Dies beeinflusst nicht unsere Bewertungen. Mehr erfahren
Vultr Bewertung 2026
Vultr is a versatile cloud provider that excels in global coverage and performance flexibility. The 32 data center locations and High Frequency compute options set it apart. Support quality is the main weakness, but if you are comfortable managing servers independently, Vultr delivers excellent infrastructure at competitive prices.
Unsere Bewertung: Vultr
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
32 data center locations worldwide
The largest geographic spread of any provider on our list. Locations across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and Africa ensure low latency globally.
High-frequency compute option
NVMe-backed high-frequency plans deliver significantly faster single-threaded performance, ideal for applications that need quick response times.
Bare metal servers available
Dedicated bare metal servers provide raw performance without virtualization overhead, perfect for resource-intensive self-hosted applications.
One-click app marketplace
Deploy popular applications like Docker, Nextcloud, and WordPress with pre-configured images that work out of the box.
Flexible block storage
Attach additional NVMe block storage volumes to any instance, scaling storage independently from compute resources.
Kubernetes support
Vultr Kubernetes Engine (VKE) offers managed Kubernetes with a free control plane, integrated load balancing, and persistent volumes.
DDoS protection included
Automatic DDoS mitigation on all instances helps protect self-hosted services from common attack vectors without extra cost.
Nachteile
Support quality inconsistent
Support responses can be generic or unhelpful, especially for complex technical issues. The ticket system lacks the depth of DigitalOcean's documentation-backed responses.
Control panel feels dated
The Vultr dashboard, while functional, looks and feels older than competitors like DigitalOcean or Hetzner. Navigation can be unintuitive for new users.
No managed databases
Vultr previously offered managed databases but has since deprecated the service. You must manage your own database instances.
Bandwidth limits on lower plans
The 2 TB bandwidth on the cheapest plan can be limiting for media-heavy self-hosted apps. Overages are charged at $0.01/GB.
Account funding required upfront
Vultr requires prepaid account credit before provisioning, which adds friction compared to post-paid billing models.
Fewer tutorials than DigitalOcean
While improving, Vultr's documentation library is noticeably thinner than DigitalOcean's extensive tutorial collection.
Vultr Preispläne
| Plan | CPU | RAM | Storage | Bandwidth | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud Compute | 1 vCPU | 2 GB | 50 GB SSD | 2 TB | $10.00/mo | Get Started → |
| Cloud Compute Best Value | 2 vCPU | 4 GB | 80 GB SSD | 3 TB | $20.00/mo | Get Started → |
| High Frequency | 2 vCPU | 4 GB | 64 GB NVMe | 3 TB | $24.00/mo | Get Started → |
| Bare Metal | E-2286G | 32 GB | 2x 480GB SSD | 5 TB | $120.00/mo | Get Started → |
| Competitor comparison (similar specs): Hetzner: $4.15/mo DigitalOcean: $24.00/mo Linode: $12.00/mo | ||||||
Vultr vs Konkurrenten
| Feature | Vultr | Hetzner | DigitalOcean |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVMe SSD Storage | On High Frequency plans | Regular SSD on basic | |
| Hourly Billing | |||
| Load Balancers | |||
| Managed Kubernetes | VKE | ||
| Managed Databases | Deprecated | Not available | Postgres, MySQL, Redis, MongoDB, Kafka, Valkey, OpenSearch |
| Object Storage | Spaces | ||
| Floating IPs | Reserved IPs | Reserved IPs | |
| Firewalls | |||
| Snapshots | |||
| Backups | $1-$3/mo extra | 20% of server price | 20% of Droplet price |
| Private Networking | VPC 2.0 | VPC | |
| IPv6 Support | |||
| API Access | |||
| Terraform Provider | |||
| One-Click Apps | Limited selection | 100+ images | |
| DDoS Protection | Basic included |
Was können Sie auf Vultr bereitstellen?
Vultr Kundensupport
- Ticket System
Wer sollte Vultr nutzen?
Ideal für
- Users who need servers in specific global regions with 32 locations
- Performance-focused projects that benefit from High Frequency compute
- Self-hosters needing bare metal servers for resource-intensive workloads
- Game server hosts who need low-latency global infrastructure
Nicht ideal für
- Users who rely heavily on support for troubleshooting issues
- Beginners who prefer a modern, intuitive dashboard interface
- Projects that require managed database services
- Users who dislike prepaid account funding before provisioning
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Vultr rank on our geographic coverage chart?
Vultr leads with 32 regions—highest in our dataset. Hetzner (4), DigitalOcean (14), and Linode (11) all score lower. Our latency heatmap shows Vultr's Asia and South America presence as a differentiator.
What is Vultr High Frequency in our scoring?
NVMe + high-clock CPUs earn "high performance" marks in our single-threaded benchmark. At $24/mo (2vCPU), it costs ~15% more than standard but ranks in top quartile for responsiveness.
Does Vultr offer bare metal in our comparison?
Yes—$120/mo E-2286G (32GB RAM, 2x480GB SSD). Our "raw compute" column identifies bare metal as a unique strength; Linode and Hetzner lack this option entirely.
How does Vultr compare to Linode per our data?
Vultr wins on regions (32 vs. 11) and bare metal availability. Linode wins on support score (8.0 vs. 7.0) and documentation depth in our methodology.
How does Vultr snapshot pricing factor into TCO?
Snapshots at $0.05/GB/month add ~$5-15/month for typical 100-300GB images. Our "total cost of backup" scenario includes this in long-term cost projections.
Does Vultr support gaming infrastructure per our testing?
Yes. High Frequency latency (our direct benchmark) shows sub-50ms from most game server hubs. Our "use case: gaming" filter highlights this strength.