Hinweis: Wir erhalten Provisionen ueber Partnerlinks. Dies beeinflusst nicht unsere Bewertungen. Mehr erfahren
Hostinger Bewertung 2026
Hostinger is the best choice for self-hosting beginners who want an easy setup experience backed by responsive support. The introductory pricing is compelling, though renewal rates are a concern. If you are new to VPS hosting and want a guided experience, Hostinger delivers. Power users should consider Hetzner or DigitalOcean for more advanced features.
Unsere Bewertung: Hostinger
Vor- und Nachteile
Vorteile
Extremely beginner-friendly interface
Hostinger's custom hPanel is designed for newcomers, with guided setup wizards, one-click installers, and a clean dashboard that avoids overwhelming users with technical jargon.
Excellent 24/7 live chat support
Support agents are available around the clock via live chat and consistently receive high satisfaction ratings. Average response time under 2 minutes during business hours.
Strong introductory pricing
First-term prices are among the lowest in the industry, especially on longer commitments, making it affordable to get started with self-hosting.
Global data center coverage
Data centers across North America, Europe, Asia, and South America provide low-latency options for users worldwide.
Built-in AI assistant
An integrated AI tool helps with server configuration, troubleshooting, and provides contextual recommendations for optimizing your setup.
One-click OS templates
Pre-configured templates for popular Linux distributions and applications let you deploy a working server in minutes.
Weekly automatic backups included
All VPS plans include automatic weekly backups at no extra cost, providing a safety net without additional configuration.
Dedicated IP on all plans
Every VPS comes with a dedicated IPv4 address included in the price, unlike some providers that charge extra.
Nachteile
Significant renewal price increase
After the initial term, prices typically double or triple. A plan advertised at $4.99/mo may renew at $11.99/mo or higher.
No hourly billing option
Unlike Hetzner or DigitalOcean, Hostinger requires monthly or longer commitments. No pay-by-the-hour flexibility for testing.
Limited API functionality
The API is less mature than competitors, making infrastructure-as-code workflows more difficult to implement.
No managed Kubernetes
Container orchestration must be set up manually. No managed Kubernetes service available for scaling container workloads.
Lower bandwidth allocations
Bandwidth limits are tighter than Hetzner or Vultr, which could be an issue for high-traffic self-hosted applications.
No object storage service
Hostinger does not offer S3-compatible object storage, so you'll need a third-party solution for large file storage needs.
Hostinger Preispläne
| Plan | CPU | RAM | Storage | Bandwidth | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KVM 1 | 1 vCPU | 4 GB | 50 GB NVMe | 4 TB | $4.99/mo | Get Started → |
| KVM 2 Best Value | 2 vCPU | 8 GB | 100 GB NVMe | 8 TB | $6.99/mo | Get Started → |
| KVM 4 | 4 vCPU | 16 GB | 200 GB NVMe | 16 TB | $12.99/mo | Get Started → |
| KVM 8 | 8 vCPU | 32 GB | 400 GB NVMe | 32 TB | $19.99/mo | Get Started → |
| Competitor comparison (similar specs): Hetzner: $4.15/mo DigitalOcean: $24.00/mo Vultr: $12.00/mo | ||||||
Hostinger vs Konkurrenten
| Feature | Hostinger | Hetzner | DigitalOcean |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVMe SSD Storage | Regular SSD on basic | ||
| Hourly Billing | Monthly minimum | ||
| Load Balancers | |||
| Managed Kubernetes | |||
| Managed Databases | Not available | Postgres, MySQL, Redis, MongoDB, Kafka, Valkey, OpenSearch | |
| Object Storage | Spaces | ||
| Floating IPs | Reserved IPs | ||
| Firewalls | |||
| Snapshots | |||
| Backups | Weekly included | 20% of server price | 20% of Droplet price |
| Private Networking | VPC | ||
| IPv6 Support | |||
| API Access | Limited | ||
| Terraform Provider | |||
| One-Click Apps | Large selection | Limited selection | 100+ images |
| DDoS Protection | Basic included |
Was können Sie auf Hostinger bereitstellen?
Hostinger Kundensupport
- Live Chat
- Ticket System
- Knowledge Base
Wer sollte Hostinger nutzen?
Ideal für
- Complete beginners who want the easiest VPS setup experience
- Users on a tight budget who can commit to longer billing terms
- WordPress and blog self-hosters seeking one-click templates
- Anyone who values responsive 24/7 live chat support
Nicht ideal für
- Power users who need hourly billing and advanced cloud features
- DevOps teams requiring Terraform, API automation, or Kubernetes
- Projects needing object storage or private networking
- Users sensitive to renewal price increases after the initial term
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Hostinger rank on your UX scoring?
Hostinger scores 9.5/10 on ease-of-use in our model (highest tier). hPanel and one-click templates rank top-quartile. Contrast this against Hetzner's 8.0 score in our methodology.
How does renewal pricing factor into your rating?
Our chart flags Hostinger's renewal multiplier (2-3x intro rate) in the "cost continuity" column. Spec by spec, this impacts TCO scoring vs. fixed-price competitors like Hetzner.
Is Hostinger a managed or unmanaged VPS?
Unmanaged—but our support scoring (9.0/10) and UX design compensate heavily. It lands between DigitalOcean (managed) and Hetzner (fully self-serve) on our spectrum.
Can Hostinger run containerized workloads in your test?
Yes; Docker installs on any plan. But no managed orchestration. Our feature matrix shows this gap vs. Hetzner's managed k3s option.
What does your data show: Hostinger vs. Hetzner?
Hostinger wins on support (9.0 vs. 7.5) and UX (9.5 vs. 8.0). Hetzner dominates price-per-CPU, flexibility (hourly billing), and feature breadth. Our side-by-side table is definitive.
Is the 30-day refund policy reflected in your rating?
Yes; we weight cancellation friction and refund accessibility in our "ease of exit" metric. Hostinger scores favorably here.
How many regions are in your latency benchmarks for Hostinger?
Seven: US, UK, Netherlands, Lithuania, Singapore, India, Brazil. Our regional filter shows live latency and uptime %ile for each.